Thank you for the swift Response, Tilman.  This is useful and will help us
plan a timeline for our eventual PDFBox 3.0.x migration.

Regards,
Larry Lynn

p.s.  Sorry I was slow getting back to you.  It looks like I was properly
subscribed to the dev mailing list but not the users mailing list.  I
believe I've fixed that now.  I found your response on the archive:
https://lists.apache.org/list.html?users@pdfbox.apache.org

On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 1:41 PM Larry Lynn <larry.l...@workiva.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys.
>
> My team has used PDFBox for a number of years now.  It's an awesome piece
> of software and we're really grateful for all the work that you've done on
> it.
>
> We are currently using PDFBox 2.0.28.  We are aware that the PDFBox 3.0.x
> branch has come out of beta and is now on mainline support.  We think that
> you're adhering to SemVer, so we expect that the jump to PDFBox 3.0.x will
> introduce some backwards compatibility breaking changes.  We're expecting
> that we'll have a large refactor in our stack to take advantage of the new
> features that you've built into v3.0.x.
>
> Have you yet set a date to deprecate or end-of-life the 2.0.x branch?
>
> I checked your website on the FAQ page
> https://pdfbox.apache.org/2.0/faq.html and the migration guide
> https://pdfbox.apache.org/2.0/migration.html.  I was unable to find a
> date for when the v2.0.x branch would no longer be supported.  If you have
> a deprecation date for v.2.0.x, we'd love to know about it so we can budget
> some time for our next upgrade project.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Larry Lynn
>
> --
> *Larry Lynn*
> *Staff Software Engineer*
> *Workiva Inc*.
>
>
>
> *448 E. Main St, Bozeman, MT, 59715*
>


-- 
*Larry Lynn*
*Staff Software Engineer*
*Workiva Inc*.



*448 E. Main St, Bozeman, MT, 59715*

Reply via email to