Rob,

The application I work on has an adhoc message server which is used to 
broadcast the changes done by any business process that might be running.
We are currently investigating qpid as a replacement for our messaging 
infrastructure. Qpid covers nicely the JMS side of things, both with the java 
and the Cpp version.
Now, for our internal message bus, the java version, for the reason that you 
know, does not seem to cut it.

In essence, each of our processes register with the broker, so that when one 
process modifies a piece of data, it publishes it to the message broker, which 
then broadcast the change to all the listening processors, therefore 
maintaining all the processors in synch.

Does that help ?

Kind Regards

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Godfrey [mailto:rob.j.godf...@gmail.com] 
Sent: 22 August 2012 14:23
To: users@qpid.apache.org
Subject: Re: java no-auth

Hi Laurent,

can you explain a little more your requirements around message sequence?  I did 
look at implementing this in the Java broker at one point, however because of 
the way that the Java Broker works there's no easy way to guarantee that the 
order at which messages arrive at an exchange correspond with the order in 
which they are enqueued in a queue (except where the messages are produced by 
the same connection).
 Moreover modifying the message header is a bit messy.

Cheers,
Rob

On 22 August 2012 13:28,  <laurent.deco...@sungard.com> wrote:
> Ok, it seems there is no pd-auth-manager node at all.
>
> Now, it also seems that the java broker, even in its version 0.18, does not 
> support the sequence attribute for an exchange / topic. At least, it is not 
> reported by the JMX console.
>
> So I think that's the end of the game :|
>
> Kind Regards
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: laurent.deco...@sungard.com [mailto:laurent.deco...@sungard.com]
> Sent: 22 August 2012 11:02
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: RE: java no-auth
>
> Hi Robbie,
>
> Thanks for that, I have now upgraded to 0.18.
> I changed this section
> <security>
>         <pd-auth-manager>
>             <anonymous-auth-manager/>
>         </pd-auth-manager>
>   ...
> Obviously I gave the java broker a go at digesting the qpid-config 
> stuff... it persists in answering the same thing :(
> Failed: AuthenticationFailure: sasl negotiation failed: no mechanism 
> agreed
>
> As I was not sure what to replace, I also got rid of the pd-auth-manager 
> node, but this did not help either...
> <security>
>        <anonymous-auth-manager/>
>
> Kind Regards
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robbie Gemmell [mailto:robbie.gemm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 21 August 2012 23:04
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Subject: Re: java no-auth
>
> The Java broker doesn't support Anonymous authentication in 0.16, but it does 
> as of 0.18 (which is currently being voted on for release, candidate 
> artifacts available at: http://people.apache.org/~jross/qpid-0.18/ ).
> Support for Anonymous can be configured in etc/config.xml by replacing the 
> <pd-auth-manager> ... </pd-auth-manager> segment with 
> <anonymous-auth-manager/>. It is possible to have multiple auth managers with 
> per-port mappings but it doesn't sound like you need that functionality.
>
> The QMF based python command line tools for the C++ broker have never 
> been particularly well supported by the Java broker, we have some 
> unfinished
> QMFv1 support in there but the substantially different QMFv2 came 
> along shortly after it was added and it sounds like the tools have 
> finally moved to QMFv2 and broken what functionality did work. We plan 
> to extract the
> QMFv1 support from the Java broker soon, until we can work on QMFv2 suport at 
> a later date. In the meantime the Java broker has a long standing JMX 
> management interface you can use with Jconsole/VisualVM/Qpid JMX Management 
> Console/etc, as well as a new HTTP management interface and web ui (replacing 
> the JMX console going forward) initially available in 0.18 and being improved 
> beyond that.
>
> Robbie
>
> On 21 August 2012 13:03, <laurent.deco...@sungard.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello there,
>>
>> I would like to run the qpid-config python script against the java 
>> qpid-server.
>>
>> When I do something like
>>
>> python qpid-config add exchange topic MsgServer --durable --sequence
>>
>> I get
>>
>> Failed: AuthenticationFailure: sasl negotiation failed: no mechanism 
>> agreed
>>
>> If I was to run the Cpp version, qpidd with no-auth, that would work 
>> nicely.
>>
>> Now my question is: what do I need to configure to run my java server 
>> with the "no-auth" cpp equivalent ?
>>
>> Kind Regards
>> Laurent
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For 
> additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For 
> additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional 
commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org

Reply via email to