On 08/08/2013 04:09 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote:
Sure, why not. Currently we also don't have any named subscriptions based
on user ID with 0.10 - only named queues and we never had a problem with it.
In the ATTACH command, the client sends only the link name from the
address. Can't we leave the link names as they are right now (i.e.
container-id + link name), but name the queue only by the link name and
leave the container id out of it? The queue names are well protected by
existing ACL rules and every user can easily specify it in the address. The
problem with the uniqueness of the queue name will be left to the user, but
that will be not different from creating the queues from the address in
AMQP 0.10.
My concern there is that from an AMQP 1.0 perspective it is entirely
legal to use the same link name with a different container-id and for
those uses not to interfere with each other.
Regards
Jakub
PS: I tried to connect twice a client with the same container ID & link
name ... the client gets exception about exclusive queue which already has
an consumer. But what is more important, the broker crashes. I guess I can
enter another JIRA ...
Oops, yes please!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
