Ah, nice, with the shared capability it is as I wanted it :-) Are these AMQP 1.0 related changes documented somewhere? The trunk documentation section on the website doesn't contain the C++ broker docu ... only the Java broker docu and the Programming guide (which doesn't seem to mention 1.0 anyway).
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 08/08/2013 05:04 PM, Jakub Scholz wrote: > >> I entered both JIRAs - they are QPID-5060 and QPID-5061 (although I guess >> you can see them in the developer mailing list anyway). >> > > Thanks again, Jakub! I appreciate you taking the time to try it out and > report back on the problems. > > > My concern there is that from an AMQP 1.0 perspective it is entirely legal >> >>> to use the same link name with a different container-id and for those >>> uses >>> not to interfere with each other. >>> >>> >>> Yes, that might be a complication. I might be changing the original >> concept >> too much to fit my purpose :-o >> >> > Note that if you want to *share* a subscription queue, you can request the > shared capability in which case only the link name is used for the queue. > (This is an extension to 1.0) > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected].**org<[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
