On 13 May 2014 20:04, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/13/2014 05:12 PM, Chuck Rolke wrote: > >> I like having registered properties especially for common cases. >> >> 'client-pid' and 'client-name' would be my first vote. >> > > The reason I don't like 'client' in there is that its not always 'clients' > making the connection and further, 'client' means different things in > different contexts. E.g. in an RPC over messaging situation the 'client' is > the process making the requests, the 'server' the one responding, though > from a brokers point of view both are clients. > > Agreed, it would be good to keep description of the 'process type' out of the names to avoid ambiguity and reduce the temptation in future to create alternate properties conveying the same information.
> > 'pid' and 'pname' second. >> 'pid' and 'process' third. >> > > I'm fine with any of these. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
