+1 Ship It! ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gordon Sim" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:54:43 PM > Subject: Re: AMQP 1.0 connection property names > > On 05/13/2014 08:25 PM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > On 13 May 2014 17:59, Justin Ross <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> How about process_name and process_id then? > >> > >> > >> I like those. I don't think brevity is important in this case, and those > >> names are very clear to me. > >> > > > > Works for me too. > > Ok, does anyone object to process_name and process_id? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
