That's fine by me, though in general I tend to think it's better to have fewer bundles and keep the examples with the client libraries they correspond to.
A separate issue: the examples artefact is a jar, not a tar.gz like the other artefacts. That's certainly not a big deal, just a little incongruous. Justin On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4 August 2014 11:31, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 07/31/2014 02:01 PM, Keith W wrote: > >> > >> It occurs to me that as the Java Client Examples are now a separate > >> artefact in its own right (rather than examples being part of the Java > >> Client), I think it would be a good idea if this artefact is > >> distributed too. It is the artefact generated by > >> java/client/example/pom.xml. I expect this will be useful for users > >> and I for one always use drain/spout from the examples for my kick the > >> tyres type tests. > > > > > > I agree, having examples or 'test clients' of some kind easily accessible > > and guaranteed to work with a given release is important. > > > > Is this separate artefact only the 0-10 and earlier compatible examples? > > These examples are suitable for 0-8..0-10. > > > Is there a separate one for the 1.0 client? > > qpid-ampq-1-0-client does have its own examples (./examples), but > there is no maven pom.xml, so there is no distributable artefact. > It would be easy to add a pom.xml. I'm happy to volunteer to do this. > Thoughts? > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
