On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:44:28AM -0400, Alan Conway wrote: > I think using foo-qpid-messaging is good because it is good - these > packages are just the qpid messaging API client. I think python-qpid is > not good. It is also a qpid messaging API client, it doesn't have any > other parts of qpid in it. I would suggest something like: > python-pure-qpid-messaging > python-native-qpid-messaging > to make it clear how it differs from python-qpid-messaging.
I agree with Rafi that we should avoid "native" here since that's likely misleading. Depending on the long term plans for the pure bindings, I would leave them as "python-qpid". -- Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc. Delivering value year after year. Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors. http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
pgpXJsC1ubkMT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
