On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Timothy Bish <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02/19/2015 08:01 AM, Robbie Gemmell wrote: > >> Any more opinions out there on the name/version of the new client? If >> not, I'll likely proceed to update the version to 0.1.0[-SNAPSHOT], >> leave the module names as qpid-jms-foo, and begin working on setting >> up a Jenkins job to publish snapshots to repository.apache.org later >> today or tomorrow. >> >> Robbie >> > > I like the idea of just letting the new client supplant the old one using > the QPid JMS name. I'm pretty sure no matter what we called it there'd be > confusion so I think its better to just try and do a good job of making > things clear on the website and answer the question as they come up. Over > time this should all work itself out. +1 --Rafael
