On 27 March 2017 at 12:35, Robbie Gemmell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 27 March 2017 at 10:47, Rob Godfrey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27 March 2017 at 11:31, Keith W <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi all > >> > >> Now the Qpid Broker for Java and Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client are > >> separated [1]/[2], I'd like to propose the final two remaining Qpid > >> components are migrated from SVN to GIT. > >> > >> * Qpid Broker for Java > >> * Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client > >> > >> This will give us a consistent, Git based, version control approach > >> across the whole project and therefore a simpler 'getting involved' > >> story that should benefit the community as a whole. > >> > >> The source code migration will maintain source code history, including > >> existing release branches and tags made since r1673693/QPID-6481 [3] > >> > >> The intention would be for all future releases to be made from git. > >> This would include any future maintenance releases from 6.0.x and > >> 6.1.x (which would remain combined broker/client releases). > >> > >> Qpid Broker for Java: > >> > >> Current SVN location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/java/ > >> Proposed GIT repo: git://git.apache.org/qpid-broker > >> <http://git.apache.org/qpid-broker-for-java.git>-for-java.git > >> <http://git.apache.org/qpid-broker-for-java.git> > > > > > > > > Do we have to make the repo name quite so wordy? :-) git:// > > git.apache.org/qpid-broker.git would work for me. > > > > > >> > >> > >> The existing GIT mirror at git://git.apache.org/qpid-java.git would > cease. > >> > >> Qpid JMS AMQP 0-x Client: > >> > >> Current SVN location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/ > >> asf/qpid/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x/ > >> Proposed GIT repo: git://git.apache.org/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x.git > >> > >> The existing GIT mirror at git://git.apache.org/qpid-jms-amqp-0-x.git > >> would become the 'live' repo.. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > > > > No objections on the client side, and OK on the broker side with the > > proviso that I'd prefer a shorter repo name :-) > > > > -- Rob > > > > > >> > >> [1] http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Drop-the-AMQP-0-x- > >> client-from-the-Qpid-for-Java-7-0-release-td7657770.html > >> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-7622 > >> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-6481 > >> > > > I'm also not hugely fond of 'qpid-broker-for-java' as a repo name. > Using only 'qpid-broker' doesn't necessarily do a great job of > signalling which broker it contains, though the contents would make it > pretty obvious and seeing that the cpp broker is in 'qpid-cpp' isn't > much of a stretch or that surprising (particularly as its been there a > while now, and I doubt we will separate those bits further). Adding > '-j' might be another option though. > > The above was literally my reasoning as I considered what name I would give it... I'd also be happy with qpid-broker-j however that's not what we call it in maven, etc (though I wouldn't be hugely upset to rename it consistently). > Regardless which of these its called, happy to proceed and will be > glad to see them moved to git. > > +1 -- Rob > Side note, git.apache.org doesn't actually hold the live repos, just > mirrors. The actual writable repos would be at > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/<name>.git > > Robbie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
