On 15 November 2017 at 14:13, Gordon Sim <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/11/17 18:11, Keith W wrote: >> >> I infer that CPP Broker must be optimistically sending the >> Disposition back to the client before the data is sync'd, so that is >> why you see better performance (but with a lesser guarantee). > > > I don't believe that is the case. The c++ broker only sends back the > disposition once confirmed by the store (and the linear store only confirms > once synced). >
Agreed. I retract my statement. I've now tested Tomas's JMS reproduction against the C++ Broker with linearstore with durable queue and Broker-J on the same hardware. I got similar throughput numbers in both cases. > Are you sure that (a) the store was in use and (b) you were waiting for > acknowledgement of one message before sending the next (sending > asynchronously is obviously faster)? > Tomas, can you tell us more? > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
