Hi Robbie, I just realized that I placed my response to incorrect person. It supposed to be a reply to Keith's message.
To your questions. The test was performed with C client based on proton 0.18.1. However, I got very similar results also with qpid-send tool which settles after each message. I've also tried sending using 0-10 and 1.0 protocol versions but no significant differences. I also executed test client based on Qpid JMS 0.23.0 with very similar results. In all cases C++ broker was able to settle and send acknowledgment way much faster than java broker. Is there something in the settings that can be tweaked to improve IO performance? Regards, Tomas -- Sent from: http://qpid.2158936.n2.nabble.com/Apache-Qpid-users-f2158936.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
