With it not being a regression and a jira to look into it further I think I'm +1 for this release in that case.
On 2022/03/21 07:56:10 Robbie Gemmell wrote: > Great, thanks for looking into this Cliff. > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 at 05:46, Cliff Jansen <cliffjan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I can reproduce the problem seen by Roddie with Python 3.10.2 on Fedora 35. > > > > It fails in the same way with 0.36.0, so it is not a regression. > > > > If I increase the sleep time in the fdlimit.py driver program, the failure > > goes away. In my opinion, this is a flaky test that Python 3.10 triggers > > more frequently than previous versions of Python. > > > > Consequently, I don’t think this is a reason to hold up the release. I will > > raise a Jira to look into this further. > > > > Cliff > > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 10:35 AM Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I haven't, I'm using 3.9. > > > > > > I seem to recall you seeing issue with the tests (inc this one) with > > > 0.36.0, at least in one env whereas in another they all passed. > > > Historically I think it has been a little flakey. Though I haven't > > > personally had it fail locally. > > > > > > Unless someone with more of a clue about these bits indicates > > > otherwise, I think we will be proceeding. I'll leave the vote open > > > until Monday for more feedback. > > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 at 09:13, Roddie Kieley <rkie...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Has anyone else been testing with python 3.10? I see that we specify > > > python 3.6+ as per: > > > > > > > > -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.10 (found suitable version "3.10.0", > > > minimum required is "3.6") found components: Interpreter Development > > > Development.Module Development.Embed > > > > > > > > but on Fedora 34 with python 3.10 installed and built using gcc I see > > > that the c-fdlimits-tests fail intermittently. With clang 12.0.1 + python > > > 3.10 the list of failures is larger and more consistent. Should we expect > > > this to be a python 3.10 to be usable at the moment? If this is not an > > > issue specific to my environment, are we able to release note it? > > > > > > > > On 2022/03/15 17:33:48 Robbie Gemmell wrote: > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > I have put together another spin for a Qpid Proton 0.37.0 release, > > > > > please give it a test out and vote accordingly. > > > > > > > > > > The files can be grabbed from: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/qpid/proton/0.37.0-rc2/ > > > > > > > > > > The JIRAs assigned are: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313720&version=12350731 > > > > > > > > > > It is tagged as 0.37.0-rc2. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Robbie > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
