ActiveMQ Artemis is probably the most obvious choice as it has the most ongoing activity.
The fact is, as you point out, the c++ broker is not being actively maintained. Unless there are people willing to put in some time to do that, I think it is better to be clear about how things stand. On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 8:50 AM Михаил Иванов <iv...@isle.spb.ru> wrote: > > Which broker then is supposed to be used instead? > > On 10.10.2022 10:31, Gordon Sim wrote: > > In my opinion, in the absence of any volunteers able to spend some > > amount of time on it, we should 'archive' it in some way (i.e. ensure > > that the code remains available, but that it is clear from the website > > etc that it is no longer maintained). > > > > On Sat, Oct 8, 2022 at 8:44 PM Michael Ivanov<iv...@logit-ag.de> wrote: > >> Hallo, > >> > >> Is qpid c++ broker still alive? I see that last release reported on apache > >> page is 1.39.0 from 2018 and last redhat rpm package I can find is for > >> centos7/redhat7 only. When I try to build it on rocky9 it fails because > >> of missing python2 packages. > >> > >> Best regards, > >> -- > >> Michael Ivanov > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail:users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org
