I used C++ broker for about a decade, it was able to send/receive 850000 messages / second (average 500 bytes, with lowest latency possible, near few milliseconds on high load) on a 8-core (16 threads) 64gb RAM SCSI 15k rpm disks, using non-persistent queues and AMQP 0-10. These performance we are talking are of machines a decade ago (2012 XEON E5690, 3rd CORE2 generation).
It supports clustering out of box, but it doesn't have a good UI to manage / administer, but QMF protocol is able to perform lots of tasks. If you need raw pérformance, there's nothing that compares to. On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 3:00 PM Tom Jordahl <tjord...@adobe.com.invalid> wrote: > I will say that my team tried to migrate from ActiveMQ (classic) to > Artemis a few years ago and it did not go well. > > We then migrated to Qpid Broker-J (and the AMQP/JMS client library) and it > has been solid – more than ActiveMQ ever was for our use case (~100 queues, > some with GroupIDs, fairly “low” volume – max 100’s of messages per second). > > I am a big fan of Broker-J and the team that supports it here – the stuff > just works and works well. We have brought problems to the list and they > have been resolved, either by pointing us to the solution or adding > functionality that we needed. > > -- > Tom > > From: Daniil Kirilyuk <daniel.kiril...@gmail.com> > Date: Monday, October 10, 2022 at 11:02 AM > To: users@qpid.apache.org <users@qpid.apache.org> > Subject: Re: qpid c++ broker status > > Broker-J is maintained, although not many people are currently working on > it. Regarding the Java 17 compatibility, the issues you pointed out were > fixed with QPID-8586 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8586> and > QPID-8587 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-8587>. Currently the > main Broker-J branch should be able to be build both under Java 11 and Java > 17. > > Kind regards, > Daniil Kirilyuk > > On Mon, 10 Oct 2022 at 17:35, Paul <pgallen...@randomlogic.com> wrote: > > > How about Broker-j, is it still being maintained? I posted in the dev > > mailing list regarding a unit test issues last week and have received no > > response. I am currently working on updating it (8.0.6 is the code base > > I am working with) to Java 17 and building a native image (which > > partially worked with Java 11). > > > > Thanks, > > > > PGA > > > > On 10/10/2022 2:32 AM, Gordon Sim wrote: > > > ActiveMQ Artemis is probably the most obvious choice as it has the > > > most ongoing activity. > > > > > > The fact is, as you point out, the c++ broker is not being actively > > > maintained. Unless there are people willing to put in some time to do > > > that, I think it is better to be clear about how things stand. > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@qpid.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@qpid.apache.org > > > > >
