+1,I have checked

[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.

[OK]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.

[OK]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.

[OK]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.

[OK]  License and Notice are correct in source package.

[OK]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.

> 在 2019年8月29日,下午7:40,ShannonDing <[email protected]> 写道:
> 
> Hello RocketMQ Community,
> 
> This is the vote for version 1.2.3 of Apache RocketMQ Client CPP.
> 
> 
> 
> This release included main futures below:
> 
> Support transaction message.
> Support C style batch message sending.
> Support getting error information when C API returns false.
> Polish the TCP transport layer.
> Remove useless code and fix compile warnings.
> For detail info, please see the release note.
> 
> 
> 
> The artifacts:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/1.2.3-rc2/
>  
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/rocketmq-client-cpp/1.2.3-rc2/>
> 
> Git tag for the release:
> 
> https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/tree/release-1.2.3 
> <https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-client-cpp/tree/release-1.2.3>
> 
> Hash for the release tag:
> 
> dcf3a1f0b4c2b9826a391e40d053889ee4fafd91
> 
> 
> 
> Release Notes:
> 
> http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-1.2.3/
>  
> <http://rocketmq.apache.org/release_notes/release-notes-rocketmq-client-cpp-1.2.3/>
> 
> The artifacts have been signed with Key :
> 
> BBC3FBA877D30832E2FBC8F901B994150CD1E262, which can be found in the keys file:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS 
> <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/rocketmq/KEYS>
> 
> Checklist for reference,
> 
> Note that this is not official policy but may help with checking releases.
> 
> Fill in the following:
> 
> [ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Source package.               
>         
> 
> [ ]  Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for Binary package.               
>         
> 
> [ ]  Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.   
> 
> [ ]  Binary artifacts have correct names matching the current release.        
> 
> [ ]  License and Notice are correct in source package.                
> 
> [ ]  License and Notice are correct in binary package.
> 
> [ ]  All files have license headers in source package if necessary.
> 
> [ ]  No compiled archives bundled in source archive.                          
>                 
> 
> [ ]  Hash and Tag in GitHub repo is matching the current artifacts.   
> 
> [ ]  The code can be built success in the source package.             
> 
> And any other check point is welcomed and please feel free to reply to this 
> email, we sincerely hope to your feedback.
> 
> 
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number of
> 
> votes are reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> 
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> 
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> 
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> The Apache RocketMQ Team
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to