Hi,

Thanks a lot for your reply!

Yes, I have tried with the new 3.2.2-SNAPSHOT versions.

I have read from one of the Nabble forums that:
When Servicemix is running standalone, it runs on jetty and port number
is 8192.
When Servicemix is running in Geronimo, it uses Tomcat (as I am using -
Geronimo 2.0.2 with Tomcat 6 (zip)) and port number is 8443.

Options tried
==============

1. I modified the client.html (examples/bridge and examples/wsdl-first)
and changed the URL as http://localhost:8443/bridge/ and
http://localhost:8443/PersonService/

And, I got the status code as "200" that means it is able to find the
component running in tomcat at port number 8443, but the response
message that is coming back is some weird characters "" for both
examples.While, when the servicemix is running standalone, the proper
response comes back.

2. Modified the xbean.xml (for bridge and wsdl-first examples) and
person.wsdl for the port number changes from 8192 to 8443). Then rebuild
using maven.

Still, I got status code as "200", but response is the same weird
characters "".

What we want to achieve
=======================

We want to run Servicemix in Geronimo. Deploy the Servicemix components
in Geronimo and access the components running inside Geronimo using HTTP
requests (using web browser).

Please help me.

Thanks,
Yogesh

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Chris Custine
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 1:58 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: SIDDHARTHA CHANDURKAR (WT01 - Computing, Storage & Software
Products); Ahmadbasha Shaik (WT01 - Computing, Storage & Software
Products)
Subject: Re: Facing issues while deploying Apache ServiceMix 3.2.1 WAR
file in Apache Geronimo 2.0.2.

Responses inline below....

On Feb 4, 2008 10:47 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
> Thanks a lot !
>
> The WAR file gets deployed successfully with the following Warnings on

> the console:
>
> <<
> 1. WARN  [TomcatModuleBuilder] Web application . does not contain a
> WEB-INF/geronimo-web.xml deployment plan.  This may or may not be a
> problem, depending on whether you have things like resource references

> that need to be resolved.  You can also give the deployer a separate
> deployment plan file on the command line.


I believe this is harmless because all of the resources used by
ServiceMix are internal.


>
>
> 2. WARN  [EndpointRegistry] Disabled endpoint processor
> 'org.apache.servicemix.jbi.framework.support.WSDL2Processor':
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/woden/WSDLReader


The woden jar is marked as optional in servicemix-core pom.xml so the
war packaging will not include it unless it is specified explicitly.
The code treats this as a warning and looks harmless, so I would ignore
this.  Maybe someone else has info on this warning.


> 3. WARN  [ClientFactory] Cound not start ClientFactory:
> javax.naming.NotContextException: The intermediate context
> ClientFactory does not exist
> >>


This is a known issue and will not cause you issues unless you need to
gain access to the ClientFactory from another application on the same
app server instance.


>
> As told by you earlier, there is no impact of first warning. Please do

> correct me if I am wrong. Does Warning 2 & 3 can have any impact?
>
> Steps followed to deploy/install Servicemix 3.2.1 components on Apache

> Geronimo 2.0.2
> ======================================================================
> ==
> ==============
>
> From the Servicemix Web Interface (WAR file) deployed on Geronimo, I
> have browsed, installed and started the following components from the
> "hotdeploy" folder of servicemix 3.2.1 binaries:
>
> 1. From the Shared Library menu -
> servicemix-shared-3.2.1-installer.zip
> 2. From the Components menu - servicemix-http-3.2.1-installer.zip,
> servicemix-jms-3.2.1-installer.zip, servicemix-eip-3.2.1-installer.zip
> and servicemix-saxon-3.2.1-installer.zip.
>
> Deploying the sample Servicemix example - bridge browsed, deployed and

> started(from examples\bridge folder)
> ======================================================================
> ==
> ====================================
>
> 1. From the Service Assemblies menu - bridge-sa-3.2.1.zip.
>
> Now, when I tried to access the bridge example from the client.html
> from the examples/bridge folder using URL
> http://localhost:8192/bridge/, it is giving me status code - 12029 as
response.
>
> I have searched the internet and found that either the
"servicemix-http"
> component or servicemix itself is not started. However, the
> "servicemix-http" component gets started successfully, as shown on the

> Servicemix web interface. But I am not sure how to check whether
> servicemix is started or not.


I think ServiceMix is starting otherwise servicemix-http would not.
However I think there is still a problem with the servicemix-http or
bridge-sa deployment, possibly they are running but could not open the
port 8192 or something of that nature.  I would check the logs for
messages regarding these deployments again and post here if you find
anything unusual.  I am also wondering if you have tried the new
3.2.2-SNAPSHOT versions of these deployments to match the main
servicemix war deployment.

Thanks,
Chris


>
> Could you please tell me how to resolve this issue? Am I accessing the

> proper URL or why the servicemix is not getting started?
>
> Please help me.
>
> Thanks,
> Yogesh
>
>

Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary. Spread 
environmental awareness.

The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to 
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may 
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the 
intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. 
Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and 
any attachments.

WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should 
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company 
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this 
email.

www.wipro.com

Reply via email to