Have you tried with style="rpc" on the <jsr181:endpoint/> element ?
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:40 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi guys, > I observe a strange thing using my developed work: > I create a WebService from a Spring Pojo bean and I developed it on > ServiceMix using servicemix-jsr181 component. > The strangers come using it: in fact I invoke it using sendsoap an a > message that agree with the wsdl, for example: > > <SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV=" > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"; > > <SOAP-ENV:Body> > <ns1:cccheck xmlns:ns1="http://localhost:8080/CCCheck";> > <c>3</c> > </ns1:cccheck> > </SOAP-ENV:Body> > </SOAP-ENV:Envelope> > > and my return is: > > <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV=" > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";><SOAP-ENV:Body><cccheckResponse > xmlns="http://localhost:8080/CCCheck";><out xmlns=" > http://localhost:8080/CCCheck > ">false</out></cccheckResponse></SOAP-ENV:Body></SOAP-ENV:Envelope> > > That disagrees with the wsdl in fact I was waiting for a <app> tag into > <cccheckResponse> one: here is the wsdl > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?> > <wsdl:definitions xmlns:wsdl="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; > xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/"; > xmlns:smix="http://servicemix.org/wsdl/jbi/"; > xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/"; > xmlns:tns="http://localhost:8080/CCCheck"; > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; > xmlns:plnk="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/plnktype > " > targetNamespace="http://localhost:8080/CCCheck";> > > <wsdl:message name="cccheckRequestMessage"> > <wsdl:part name="c" type="xsd:integer"/> > </wsdl:message> > > <wsdl:message name="cccheckResponseMessage"> > <wsdl:part name="app" type="xsd:boolean"/> > </wsdl:message> > > <wsdl:portType name="cccheckPortType"> > <wsdl:operation name="cccheck"> > <wsdl:input message="tns:cccheckRequestMessage" > name="cccheckRequest"/> > <wsdl:output message="tns:cccheckResponseMessage" > name="cccheckResponse"/> > </wsdl:operation> > </wsdl:portType> > > <wsdl:binding name="cccheckSOAPBinding" > type="tns:cccheckPortType"><soap:binding style="rpc" transport=" > http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/> > <wsdl:operation name="cccheck"> > <soap:operation name="cccheck" soapAction="" > style="rpc"/> > <wsdl:input> > <soap:body namespace=" > http://localhost:8080/CCCheck"; use="literal"/> > </wsdl:input> > <wsdl:output> > <soap:body namespace=" > http://localhost:8080/CCCheck"; use="literal"/> > </wsdl:output> > </wsdl:operation> > </wsdl:binding> > > <wsdl:service name="CCCheckService"> > <wsdl:port binding="tns:cccheckSOAPBinding" > name="cccheckPort"> > <soap:address location=" > http://localhost:8080/CCCheck"/> > <smix:endpoint defaultMep="in-out" > role="consumer"/> > </wsdl:port> > </wsdl:service> > > <plnk:partnerLinkType name="CCCheckPartnerLinkType"> > <plnk:role name="CCCheckRole" > portType="tns:cccheckPortType"/> > </plnk:partnerLinkType> > </wsdl:definitions> > > > Using it directly may seems a silliness but I invoke this ws from a BPEL > and reading the response fails for this problem!!! > To be clearest I attach here the xbean.xml too: > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?><beans xmlns:aop=" > http://www.springframework.org/schema/aop"; xmlns:jsr181=" > http://servicemix.apache.org/jsr181/1.0"; xmlns:tx=" > http://www.springframework.org/schema/tx"; xmlns:wsdl=" > http://localhost:8080/CCCheck";> > <jsr181:endpoint annotations="none" service="wsdl:CCCheckService" > serviceInterface="CCCheckInterface" endpoint="CCCheckPort"> > <jsr181:pojo> > <bean class="CCCheck" id="cccheckService"/> > <tx:advice id="txAdvice"> > <tx:attributes> > <tx:method name="cccheck" > readOnly="true"/> > </tx:attributes> > </tx:advice> > <aop:config> > <aop:pointcut > expression="excecution(*CCCheck.*(...))" id="cccheckServiceOperation"/> > <aop:advisor advice-ref="txAdvice" > pointcut-ref="cccheckServiceOperation"/> > </aop:config> > </jsr181:pojo> > </jsr181:endpoint> > </beans> > > There is someone may give me an explanation and a way to bypass this > problem? > Thank you all in advance guys, > regards > > Simone > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
