On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:15:06AM -0400, Ludovic Marcotte wrote: > Mark Adams wrote: >> I've tried to test this in the sogo-demo version, and can see that it >> doesn't show the "sogo1" user when your adding sharing permissions - is >> this is new change? > What's the exact workflow of your test?
Right click on "personal" (although its called WCB for sogo1 user in test I think) calendar, go to sharing, then try to subscribe the user that owns the calendar to his own calendar. It doesn't show allow you to do this, but you CAN do it in the Administration interface, which I think has caused my duplication issue. >> Can't see the Administration page in the demo >> version maybe it's just a bug in that? >> > None of the sogo1, 2 nor 3 users are in the SOGoSuperUsernames so that's > normal here. >> Does anyone know where the acls are and how the permission can be >> removed in the backend? >> > If user A shares with user B and B is subscribed to A's calendar, you'll > have: > > - some data describing the ACL in the [foobarzot]_acl table associated > to that calendar found from sogo_folder_info I've checked in the *_acl for one of the affected users, and they don't have themselves listed. The duplicate must be cause by something else then? It is showing in the web interface as well as iCal. > > - some data describing the subscription from B's user settings found in > the c_settings column in the sogo_user_profile table (look for > "SubscribedFolders") > > Regards, > > -- > Ludovic Marcotte > [email protected] :: +1.514.755.3630 :: www.inverse.ca > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence > (www.packetfence.org) > > -- > [email protected] > https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
-- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
