https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases#Thunderbird_7
So if Lightning does it for TB7, then just one month to wait for ;)
(And a few days for Inverse)
Thanks, Sogo is realy a cool system
André
Am 25.08.2011 13:55, schrieb Ludovic Marcotte:
On 22/08/11 09:39, Julian Robbins wrote:
Ludovic : would you like to say something as to the timescale for
Thunderbird 5/6 support ? I know inverse is busy with the Outlook
work too, but I think letting us know your plans will help us all ...
Here's my take on this.
Porting the SOGo Connector/Integrator is generally not long.
What's long is porting all the improvements we've done to Lightning.
When we did the changes back in Lightning 0.9, we submitted all of
them to Mozilla for inclusion. Not all of them were included (lack of
time from their side). Our patches then bitrotted.
When we ported them again to Thunderbird 3.1, we resubmitted patches
but again, not all of them were included and they bitrotted again.
We're now pretty much down to three patches to be included so we don't
have to modify Lightning again. Those are:
1. refresh killer: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=502936
2. offline mode support:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=380060
3. hooks / stubs mechanisms:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=586276
The last one will allow us to move our ACL code directly in the SOGo
Connector/Integrator extensions. So we won't have to modify Lightning
anymore.
That being said, those 3 bugs should be fixed for Lightning 1.0. You
should all vote on the bugs so the patches finally get included.
Lightning 1.0 will most likely require Thunderbird 7. If that's the
case, that's the version we'll support after 3.1.
Regards,
--
Ludovic Marcotte
lmarco...@inverse.ca :: +1.514.755.3630 ::www.inverse.ca
Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
(www.packetfence.org)
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists