At Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:07:45 -0400, Fabian Rodriguez wrote: > > Le 12-04-11 05:03 PM, Martin Rabl a écrit : > > [...] > > > > P.S.: will there be a package for Ubuntu 10.04 LTS in future? > > Maybe someone can fund Jeroen's work in Debian?: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=584073 > > I'd love to see proper packaging for Debian+derivatives, but it's not > going to happen anytime soon, specially the way SOGo relies on > unsupported, manually-installed packages both in ZEG and the regular > releases. This prevents any type of vendor-provided (ie. Canonical,etc.) > commercial support and ties your production systems to Inverse's support > which I was told would change its model but hasn't in a while.
It took a lot more time than I expected, but the packaging of SOGo 1.3 suitable for upload to Debian is almost done. The current source packages can be found on github (https://github.com/dekkers/sogo-debian https://github.com/dekkers/sope-debian and https://github.com/dekkers/json-framework). There are still a lot of smaller things to fixup before an upload can happen and I'm currently too busy with other things. My target is to get SOGo 1.3 in wheezy however, so I will try to find the time to get the stuff ready for upload somewhere this month. With regards to funding, I will probably setup a donation page on my site/add a flattr thingie/etc. so people can donate if they like the work I do. But I'm currently not really planning anything else than uploading 1.3 to debian unstable/testing and backporting it to squeeze when it doesn't have problems in testing for a while. This should mean that it also goes automatically in Ubuntu with the next sync with Debian, but I don't use Ubuntu on any of my servers so I'm personally not that interested in Ubuntu packages. But I'm self-employed, so if people are willing to pay I'm also willing to work on things I'm not directly interested in. :) With regards to 2.0, I think that's still too volatile to go into a Debian stable release so I won't be working on any upload of that anytime soon. If you want to use 2.0 you can best use the Inverse packages. When wheezy gets released 2.0 will also have stabilised and I'll probably start looking at uploading 2.0 for wheezy+1 and providing 2.0 backports for wheezy. Kind regards, Jeroen Dekkers -- users@sogo.nu https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
