Thanks. We will try to put some resources in place for SQL based user
sources, and I will let you know about the results.
Regards,
Igor Vitorac
Ludovic Marcotte wrote, On 12/08/2012 01:18:
On 11/08/12 18:05, Igor Vitorac wrote:
Thank you. I have seen that, but it is not quite clear what is the
difference between two mentioned kinds ("location" and "thing").
A "group", "location" or "thing" is a resource for SOGo - just like
it's/was stated in the "Schema for representing resources for
calendaring and scheduling services"
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cal-resource-schema-06). When
KindFieldName equals either of these for an entry (LDAP or SQL), SOGo
considers it as a resource.
Additionally confusing for me is a "group" kind. In LDAP, each group
has to have a list of names, but how can we specify the users in one
group if the user source is SQL?
Once group defined, I guess, SOGo user could specify sharing
permissions (ACLs) based on the group.
This is something totally different. Groups are supported for LDAP
(for scheduling meetings, ACLs, etc.) but not for SQL.
--
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
