> On Sep 9, 2016, at 3:31 PM, Christian Mack ([email protected]) 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Or use the workaround mentiond in the bug:
> stunnel
> (Because of that the urgency to implement TLS in SOGo is very low.)

IMO, SASL AUTh and SMTP over TLS should be urgent, because:

*) it makes SOGo more flexible to connect to SMTP server
*) secure connection is so important today
*) As mentioned in another sogo mailing list thread, each activesync mobile 
client requires 20-40MB memory, isn't it normal to run SOGo on a more powerful 
server to handle more EAS clients?
*) "stunnel"? Postfix (and other MTAs) offers submission (and deprecated SMTPS) 
for years, and it's standard protocol, why stunnel? Why not improve SOGo to 
"fix" it?

----
Zhang Huangbin, founder of iRedMail project: http://www.iredmail.org/
Time zone: GMT+8 (China/Beijing).

-- 
[email protected]
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists

Reply via email to