http://web.archive.org/web/20161021054540/http://www.openchange.org/
---> yes, but what about new version samba and sogo with old openchange
packages? and what about system update? for example in debian, from
jessie to stretch
it is epic fail (
On 12/07/2016 03:35 PM, "Martin Rahnefeld" (mar...@rahnefeld.net) wrote:
Even the website is down. For those, who are in need of some kind of
documentation:
there is luckily a recent snapshot:
http://web.archive.org/web/20161021054540/http://www.openchange.org/
Am Mittwoch, Dezember 07, 2016 12:00 CET, "devteam"
(devt...@alpeinsoft.ch) <users@sogo.nu> schrieb:
Hi!
Project openchange stopped all development.
May be somebody have ideas/solutions? @Slavek?
On 07/28/2016 01:30 AM, Slávek Banko (slavek.ba...@axis.cz) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have experience with maintaining packages for multiple versions
of Debian
> and Ubuntu distributions. Thanks to this I have ready builder for many
> versions of Debian and Ubuntu for multiple architectures.
>
> I dared to prepare an alternative repository of SOGo packages for
Debian and
> Ubuntu. Packages are available not only for SOGo 3.x, but also for
SOGo 2.x.
> Distributions are Debian 7 (Wheezy), Debian 8 (Jessie), Ubuntu
14.04 (Trusty)
> and Ubuntu 16.04 (Xenial). Architectures amd64 and i386. If there
arises an
> interest, I can try to build also for other architectures (armhf,
arm64,...).
>
> Currently, all these SOGo builds are without OpenChange support,
because it is
> difficult to build OpenChange. During my attempts to build
OpenChange always
> occurs FTBFS...
>
> To install gpg key, use:
> apt-key adv --keyserver sks.labs.nic.cz --recv-key A04BE668
>
> The format of the line to the apt sources is as follows:
>
> For SOGo v.2.x
> deb http://www.axis.cz/linux/debian <your-distribution> sogo-v2
>
> For SOGo v3.x
> deb http://www.axis.cz/linux/debian <your-distribution> sogo-v3
>
> Where <your-distribution> could be: wheezy, jessie, trusty or
xenial. Do not
> be fooled by the word 'debian' in the url - this is true even for
the Ubuntu
> packages.
>
> The packages numbering follows the usual packaging rules. By the
way, packages
> are also ready to properly update during dist-upgrade, because
version of
> distribution is a part of the packages version. This is a small
advantage
> over the official Inverse packages ;)
>
> Cheers
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
--
users@sogo.nu
https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
