Hi, Am Mittwoch, 24. April 2019 17:56 CEST, "Christian Mack" ([email protected]) <[email protected]> schrieb: > That change is intentional. > Organizer is always also an Attendee, so that is an unnecessary > duplication, which caused problems. > Therefore the unnecessary ATTENDEE entry for the ORGANIZER was removed.
but is the assumption that the Organizer is always an Attendee correct? I didn't find any clarification in RFC 2445, but the example from RFC 2446 [1] suggests that the opposite is true. Regards, Frank [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2446#section-4.2 -- [email protected] https://inverse.ca/sogo/lists
