I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users.  AOL recommends 
appending digits to your screen name to make it unique, and many users do that. 
 The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA 2.63) is a penalty of 6.39 points 
right off the bat.  Isn't that a bit extreme?

Pierre Thomson
BIC


Received: from imo-m15.mx.aol.com (imo-m15.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.205])
        by mail1.domain.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i882gcu10544
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:38 -0400
Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        by imo-m15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.4.) id 4.13c.83038c (3972)
         for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:29 EDT
Subject: Re: Equipment
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
boundary="-----------------------------1094611349"
X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112
X-Local-MailScanner-Information: See www.mailscanner.info for information
X-Local-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Local-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=6.651, required 6,
        ADDR_NUMS_AT_BIGSITE 2.70, BAYES_40 -0.00, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.99,
        FROM_WEBMAIL_END_NUMS6 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16)
X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2004 02:42:45.0517 (UTC) 
FILETIME=[8554E3D0:01C4954D]

Reply via email to