>> I have had a couple of FP's recently from valid AOL users.  AOL
>> recommends appending digits to your screen name to make it unique,
>> and
>> many users do that.  The result (sender using AOL 9.0 client, SA
>> 2.63)
>> is a penalty of 6.39 points right off the bat.  Isn't that a bit
>> extreme?
>
> I know at my site, the ratio of valid users and phony users ending in
> nums is about 1000:1. If this is the same as at your site, the easiest
> thing to do probably would be to whitelist the users. You could also
> lower the score of these rules and let the other rules do their job
> instead. Most of the spam coming from these types of users scores in
> the teens to 20's anyway, so if it's legit, then SA should score
> accordingly, aside from the rules listed in your headers.

Whoops! READ:

Phony: 1000
Valid: 1

;o)



>
> Just my .02
>
> Steve
>
>>
>> Pierre Thomson
>> BIC
>>
>>
>> Received: from imo-m15.mx.aol.com (imo-m15.mx.aol.com
>> [64.12.138.205])
>>      by mail1.domain.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i882gcu10544
>>      for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:38 -0400
>> Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>      by imo-m15.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.4.) id 4.13c.83038c (3972)
>>       for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:29 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:42:29 EDT
>> Subject: Re: Equipment
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> boundary="-----------------------------1094611349"
>> X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112
>> X-Local-MailScanner-Information: See www.mailscanner.info for
>> information
>> X-Local-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>> X-Local-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, SpamAssassin (score=6.651,
>> required 6,
>>      ADDR_NUMS_AT_BIGSITE 2.70, BAYES_40 -0.00, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.99,
>>      FROM_WEBMAIL_END_NUMS6 2.70, HTML_MESSAGE 0.10, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16)
>> X-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Sep 2004 02:42:45.0517 (UTC)
>> FILETIME=[8554E3D0:01C4954D]
>>
>
>
>


Reply via email to