I removed the custom rule for OPTO_HEADER,
and just got this one through.. also seems
suspicious...
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1
required=5.5
tests=AWL,BAYES_50,HTML_FONT_BIG,
HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MPART_ALT_DIFF,
NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_SBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL,unsub15
version=3.0.0
X-Spam-Bayes: 0.5008
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
HTML_FONT_FACE_BAD,HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_16,HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,
HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_WEB_BUGS,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,MPART_ALT_DIFF,
NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_SBL,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL,unsub15
version=3.0.0
X-Spam-Bayes: 0.5008
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
From: Pierre Thomson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 10:42 AM
To: Robert Leonard
Subject: RE: How did this not get tagged??
That's
quite possible, though adding 2.4 points still wouldn't explain the total you
got. Normally BAYES_40 gives a slight negative score too, but all the
others should be positive. I'm still running SA 2.63 so I can't be sure
why you got such a low score.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 1:40 PM
To: Pierre Thomson
Subject: RE: How did this not get tagged??This message was relayed to my exchange server so I can't get it back to the Linux box for testing.. the Opto_Header might be it.. that is a legacy custom rule I made to fix the bug that SA has in which it adds 2.4 points if it find "Opt" anyplace in the headers.. my company name is 'opt'o22 so I had to subtract 2.4 from every incoming mail to fix this..Perhaps 3.0 doesn't add that 2.4 anymore?
From: Pierre Thomson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 10:34 AM
To: Robert Leonard
Subject: RE: How did this not get tagged??Hmmm... must be a big negative scoring rule there... try rinning it through in test mode (spamassassin -t) to see how each rule scored.OPTO_HEADER doesn't seem to be a stock 3.0.0 rule; perhaps that's the culprit?Pierre ThomsonBIC-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Leonard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 1:31 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: How did this not get tagged??I got the following in my headers.. I'm not sure how this could possibly score so low, with all the hits it received...
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=6.0 tests=BAYES_40,HTML_90_100,
HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_02,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,OPTO_HEADER,
RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_SBL,SARE_MSGID_EMPTY,URIBL_SBL,
URIBL_WS_SURBL version=3.0.0
X-Spam-Bayes: 0.3934
X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times.
