users  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: A lot of "invalid DKIM result" messages in my logs Nick Howitt
  • Re: A lot of "invalid DKIM result" messages in my logs Damian
  • Re: A lot of "invalid DKIM result" messages in my logs Damian
  • Re: A lot of "invalid DKIM result" messages in my logs Nick Howitt
  • Re: A lot of "invalid DKIM result" messages in my logs Damian
• All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Mark London
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Jared Hall via users
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Matija Nalis
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nick Howitt
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Bill Cole
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nick Howitt
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Matija Nalis
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Greg Troxel
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nick Howitt
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Greg Troxel
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nick Howitt
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nick Howitt
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Greg Troxel
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nick Howitt
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Kris Deugau
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Andy Smith
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Nix
  • Re: All RCVD_IN_VALIDITY rules being applied to every email. Mark London
• bounce spam natan
  • Re: bounce spam Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: bounce spam natan
• docusign fraud using docusign Alex
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign MX
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Noel Butler
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Alex
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign John Hardin
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Noel Butler
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Benny Pedersen
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Alex
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: docusign fraud using docusign Matija Nalis
• bug reported to github now was paypal.... Benny Pedersen
• paypal fraud Alex
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Bill Cole
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Jared Hall via users
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Jared Hall via users
  • Re: paypal fraud MX
  • Re: paypal fraud Benny Pedersen
  • Re: paypal fraud Matija Nalis
  • Re: paypal fraud giovanni
  • Re: paypal fraud Alex
• (Postfix, spamd) Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_in,, length is 28, should be 16 at /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl/Socket.pm line 857 revsuine
  • Re: (Postfix, spamd) Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_in,, length is 28, should be 16 at /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl/Socket.pm line 857 Benny Pedersen
  • Re: (Postfix, spamd) Bad arg length for Socket::unpack_sockaddr_in,, length is 28, should be 16 at /usr/lib/perl5/core_perl/Socket.pm line 857 revsuine
• HEADS UP: Masscheck submissions broken? Bill Cole
  • Re: HEADS UP: Masscheck submissions broken? giovanni
• idn_to_ascii: conversion natan
• Comment on lint behavior joe a
  • Re: Comment on lint behavior Bill Cole
  • Re: Comment on lint behavior joe a
• Tool for rule managing Pedro David Marco via users
  • RE: Tool for rule managing Marc
• Multiple SpamAssassins: how many X-Spam-Status header fields? Ralph Corderoy
  • Re: Multiple SpamAssassins: how many X-Spam-Status header fields? Bill Cole
• training bayes and newsletters Alex
  • Re: training bayes and newsletters Axb
  • RE: training bayes and newsletters Marc
  • Re: training bayes and newsletters Bill Cole
  • Re: training bayes and newsletters Greg Troxel
• no external relay found, skipping DMARC check Gregory Colpart via users
  • Re: no external relay found, skipping DMARC check Bill Cole
• redirector domain Benny Pedersen
• blocking compute-1.amazonaws.com Marc
  • Re: blocking compute-1.amazonaws.com Benny Pedersen
  • RE: blocking compute-1.amazonaws.com Marc
  • Re: blocking compute-1.amazonaws.com Bill Cole
  • Re: blocking compute-1.amazonaws.com John Hardin
• whitelist_from not honored ? Xavier Humbert
  • Re: whitelist_from not honored ? Xavier Humbert
  • Re: whitelist_from not honored ? Benny Pedersen
• Whitelist or BAYES? joe a
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? Kris Deugau
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? John Hardin
  • RE: Whitelist or BAYES? Marc
  • RE: Whitelist or BAYES? Marc
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? joe a
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? joe a
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? Bill Cole
  • Re: Whitelist or BAYES? Bowie Bailey
• Wild hair jdow
  • Single user install (was: Wild hair) Kenneth Porter
• ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Peter Ajamian
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Tom Bartel
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Grega via users
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matthias Leisi
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Jared Hall via users
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matthias Leisi
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Tom Hendrikx
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Sidney Markowitz
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matthias Leisi
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Sidney Markowitz
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matthias Leisi
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Łukasz Michalski
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Greg Troxel
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Sidney Markowitz
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Jared Hall via users
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Peter
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Andrew C Aitchison
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Alex
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Paul Stead
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Greg Troxel
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Tom Hendrikx
  • Apology (was Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default.) Bill Cole
  • Re: ATTENTION: DNSWL to be disabled by default. Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
• mailspike dot net Minus 1? joe a
  • Re: mailspike dot net Minus 1? joe a
  • Re: mailspike dot net Minus 1? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: mailspike dot net Minus 1? Bill Cole
  • Re: mailspike dot net Minus 1? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: mailspike dot net Minus 1? John Hardin
• Experimenting with dcc Alex
• non-free Services Philipp Ewald
  • RE: non-free Services Marc
  • Re: non-free Services Philipp Ewald
  • Re: non-free Services Laurent S.
  • Re: non-free Services Philipp Ewald
  • RE: non-free Services Simon Standley
  • Good DNSBLs not in standard spamassassin (Was Re: non-free Services) Andy Smith
• Use of uninitialized value $response[0] Niamh Holding
  • Re: Use of uninitialized value $response[0] Bill Cole
  • Re: Use of uninitialized value $response[0] Niamh Holding
  • Re: Use of uninitialized value $response[0] Niamh Holding
• Tips on training bayes? Alex
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Jared Hall via users
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Alex
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Grega via users
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? natan
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: SPAM-DETECTOR Re: Tips on training bayes? natan
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? natan
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Jared Hall via users
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Greg Troxel
  • Re: Tips on training bayes? Bill Cole
• Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Bill Cole
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Bill Cole
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Antony Stone
  • Noise Around This List (was Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3) Bill Cole
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Benny Pedersen
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 John Hardin
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Disable validity rules Grega via users
  • Re: Disable validity rules Grega via users
  • Re: Disable validity rules Grega via users
  • Re: Disable validity rules Bill Cole
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Matija Nalis
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Matija Nalis
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 hg user
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Shawn Iverson
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Bill Cole
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Shawn Iverson
  • Re: Bayes in V4 compared to V3 Grega via users

• Earlier messages
• Later messages