Duncan Hill wrote:
Content analysis details: (9.9 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 1.7 SARE_RECV_SPAM_DOMN0b Email passed through apparent spammer domain 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 BAYES_44 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 44 to 50% [score: 0.4999] 1.5 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?218.162.208.81>] 4.8 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [218.162.208.81 listed in sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org] 0.1 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address [218.162.208.81 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] 1.7 RCVD_IN_NJABL_DUL RBL: NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP [218.162.208.81 listed in combined.njabl.org]
Hi Duncan,
I ran the spam through SA and noticed that it got about 9 points now. But at the time of arrival it always get below 5 points, which is required in my configuration. :(
/ Martin
