That sounds perfect! if you would be so kind, could you send the pertinent
bits of the bash script (absolutely no hurry...)? We are also running
spamassassin on freeBSD, and I think I can (and our notes admin) set up the
mailboxes and notes stuff, but the script might take me a while to get
right. I'm pretty new to spamassassin.
I really appreciate the help.
Thanks,
Kyle Reynolds
972-731-4731
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike Carlson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
t> cc:
users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: sa-learn with
lotus notes
01/20/2005 10:05
AM
We created 2 mailboxes on our Notes server called SpamCollector and
HamCollector.
We then set up an Agent in the template that added an action to move
selected untagged spam to the Spam Collector mailbox and copy the
selected HAM messages to the Ham collector mailbox.
I created a bash script on my FreeBSD box that is running SA to log into
the different accounts via POP3 to the spamd account on the SA box and
then runs the learn process.
It works pretty slick.
You have to setup an agent to move or copy the messages to the databases
instead of forwarding them otherwise you lose the headers.
I can provide some code if you want. We are on Notes 6.5 and Domino 6.0.
--Mike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Help... I need to feed spam and ham to sa-learn. We are using lotus
notes
> R5 and I need to get the messages into a format that sa-learn can use.
The
> closest I have found is to export messages as "structured text", and this
> exports multiple messages as one file, the example below is how they are
> exported... Is this usable by sa-learn? Any suggestions? Thanks for
the
> advice.
>
>
************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
>
> Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by
> psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP
id
> 2005012009223223:23490 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:32 -0600
> Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1
> (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 110623455278; Thu, 20 Jan
2005
> 09:22:32 -0600
> Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id
> 01B1A11447; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:31 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199])
by
> smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D786E1146A for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:22:30 -0600 (CST)
> Received: (qmail 19329 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:22:09 -0000
> Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Received: (qmail 19226 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:22:08 -0000
> X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0
> tests=HTML_60_70,HTML_MESSAGE
> X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org
> Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
> Received: from mail.lastar.com (HELO server11.lastar.com) (65.89.139.10)
> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:22:06 -0800
> Received: from spamfilter.lastar.com ([192.168.70.12]) by
> server11.lastar.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005012010220301455
> for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500
> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
> spamfilter.lastar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9845CEFCE4 for
> <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from spamfilter.lastar.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost
> (spamfilter [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31569-10
> for <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500
(EST)
> Received: from server24.ctg.com (server24.ctg.com [192.168.74.10])
by
> spamfilter.lastar.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58550EFCE0 for
> <users@spamassassin.apache.org>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:22:03 -0500 (EST)
> X_MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> Subject: Testing a message
> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:22:02 AM
> $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X_MS_Has_Attach:
> X_MS_TNEF_Correlator:
> Thread_Topic: Testing a message
> Thread_Index: AcT/A8r1xq4Lq9KHR4yEJ+GLien6cQ==
> From: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SendTo: "SPAMASSASSIN" <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> X_Virus_Scanned: amavisd-new at lastar.com
> X_Virus_Checked: Checked
> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pfbspmp1.transplace.com
> X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE
> autolearn=ham version=2.63
> X_Spam_Level:
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July
> 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle
> Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:21
> AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM
> SMTPOriginator:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $UpdatedBy:
> $Orig:
> Categories:
> $Revisions:
> RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com
> RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM-01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM
> $MsgTrackFlags: 0
> DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:22:32 AM
>
> Greetings!
>
> I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running)
> A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to
> sa-learn and learned it as ham.
>
> I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up.
> What is the best way of accomplishing this?
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by
> psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP
id
> 2005012009323090:24101 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:30 -0600
> Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1
> (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235150878; Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 09:32:30 -0600
> Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id
> AE2DD11480; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:30 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> [134.130.3.130]) by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id
A0F3E11447
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:32:28 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by
> ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12
> (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:28:26 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1
> (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:26:51 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from hermes.rz.rwth-aachen.de (hermes.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> [134.130.4.36]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id
> j0KFQdUJ001781; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:26:39 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from [134.130.4.36] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
> hermes.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.8+Sun/8.12.2-1) with ESMTP id
> j0KFHElg012554; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:20:48 +0100 (CET)
> Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE
> [134.130.3.130]) by hermes.rz.rwth-aachen.de (8.12.8+Sun/8.12.2-1) with
> ESMTP id j0KFHBle012550 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20
Jan
> 2005 16:17:11 +0100 (CET)
> Received: from circe (circe.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.36]) by
> ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.12
> (built Feb 13 2003)) with ESMTP id
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ORCPT [EMAIL PROTECTED]); Thu,
> 20 Jan 2005 16:17:10 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from relay2.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.6]) by circe
(MailMonitor
> for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:09 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from smtps-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtps-vbr2.xs4all.nl
[194.109.24.18])
> by relay2.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.0/8.13.0/1) with ESMTP id j0KFH7st023252
> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:17:07 +0100 (MET)
> Received: from isop10 (velvet.isolution.nl [194.109.164.102])
> (authenticated bits=0) by smtps-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with
> ESMTP id j0KFH715004012 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 16:17:07 +0100 (CET envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:16:57 AM
> Principal: "Ruud H.G. van Tol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Variable names
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> SendTo: "[procmail]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Errors_To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Organization: Chaos rules.
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> X_MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
> $Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
> DeliveryPriority: N
> X_MSMail_Priority: Normal
> Precedence: list
> X_BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X_Virus_Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X_Mailman_Version: 2.1.5
> list_post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List_Subscribe: <http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
>,
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_unsubscribe:
> <http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail>,
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List_Archive: <http://mailman.RWTH-Aachen.de/pipermail/procmail>
> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> List_Id: discussion of the procmail program
> <procmail.lists.RWTH-Aachen.DE>
> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pfbspmp1.transplace.com
> X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham
> version=2.63
> X_Spam_Level:
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July
> 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:32:30 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle
> Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:21
> AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:21 AM
> SMTPOriginator: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $UpdatedBy:
> $Orig:
> Categories:
> $Revisions:
> RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com
> RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:32:30 AM-01/20/2005 09:32:31 AM
> $MsgTrackFlags: 0
> DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:32:31 AM
>
> Toen wij NM Public kietelden, kwam er dit uit:
>
>
>>Does anyone know if there are any
>>conventions for naming user-defined procmail variables?
>
>
> I (try to) follow a namespace-approach. Inside abc.inc
> I use abc_Varname for variables.
>
> At the end of abc.inc I (should) unset all variables
> that have no business outside abc.inc.
>
> I sometimes used double underscore for locals, so
> abc__Varname, but than an abc_Varname could also exist
> and that would be a new source of problems. An
> alternative would be abc_LOC_Varname.
>
>
> Inside .procmailrc, the special 'PM_' prefix could be
> chosen. And 'H_' for values derived from Headers, 'B_'
> for body-vars, 'G_' for common globals.
>
> Some often used variables should stay as they are, like
> SPC, TAB, WSP (the one without []), NL, and such.
>
>
>
>>Or for
>>user-defined variables in the Unix world in general?
>
>
> Both perl and PHP have namespaces. That helps a lot.
>
> In a new procmail, we could have real namespaces, like
> namespace.Varname. And multiple matches, like MATCH1..
> MATCHn. And, and, ...
>
> --
> Grtz, Ruud
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> procmail mailing list Procmail homepage: http://www.procmail.org/
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
>
>
>
> Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by
> psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP
id
> 2005012009333540:24187 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:35 -0600
> Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1
> (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235214958; Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 09:33:34 -0600
> Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id
> D720B11481; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:34 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199])
by
> smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E49C811485 for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:33:33 -0600 (CST)
> Received: (qmail 54834 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:33:25 -0000
> Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Received: (qmail 54818 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:33:25 -0000
> X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0
> tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
> X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org
> Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
> Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc11.comcast.net)
> (204.127.198.35) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan
2005
> 07:33:23 -0800
> Received: from mk.comcast.net
> (pcp0010744015pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net[69.243.87.84]) by
> comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id
<200501201533200130090j09e>;
> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:33:21 +0000
> $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> $Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14
> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:33:22 AM
> SendTo: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,"SPAMASSASSIN"
> <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Testing a message
> In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> X_Virus_Checked: Checked
> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pfbspmp1.transplace.com
> X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham
> version=2.63
> X_Spam_Level:
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July
> 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle
> Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:21
> AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM
> SMTPOriginator:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $UpdatedBy:
> $Orig:
> Categories:
> $Revisions:
> RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com
> RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM-01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM
> $MsgTrackFlags: 0
> DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:33:35 AM
>
> At 10:22 AM 1/20/2005, Jason Gauthier wrote:
>
>> I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running)
>>A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to
>>sa-learn and learned it as ham.
>>
>>I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up.
>>What is the best way of accomplishing this?
>
>
> pipe it through the spamassassin command line:
>
> spamassassin <message.txt
>
> Optionaly you can add the -t parameter to force SA to generate a spam
> report, even if it's below the threshold (helpful to see all the rules).
>
> Note: Make sure that sa-learn and spamassassin are being run as the same
> user than amavis will access spamassassin as. Otherwise you might be
using
> a different bayes database (They default to being in $HOME)
>
>
>
>
> Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by
> psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP
id
> 2005012009345142:24260 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:51 -0600
> Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1
> (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235291367; Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 09:34:51 -0600
> Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id
> 44B3711481; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:51 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199])
by
> smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C2DE11457 for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:34:50 -0600 (CST)
> Received: (qmail 58916 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:40 -0000
> Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Received: (qmail 58903 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:40 -0000
> X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=0.1 required=10.0 tests=FORGED_RCVD_HELO
> X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org
> Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
> Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (HELO smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl)
> (194.109.24.22) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan
2005
> 07:34:38 -0800
> Received: from webmail.xs4all.nl (webmail7.xs4all.nl [194.109.22.167])
by
> smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j0KFYXd5063471;
> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:34:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> Received: from 80.127.176.177 by webmail.xs4all.nl with HTTP;
> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:34:34 +0100 (CET)
> $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:34 AM
> Subject: Re: Testing a message
> From: "Menno van Bennekom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SendTo: "Jason Gauthier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CopyTo: "SPAMASSASSIN" <users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> ReplyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> User_Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
> $Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> X_Virus_Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
> X_Virus_Checked: Checked
> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pfbspmp1.transplace.com
> X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.6 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham
> version=2.63
> X_Spam_Level:
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July
> 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle
> Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:22
> AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM
> SMTPOriginator:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $UpdatedBy:
> $Orig:
> Categories:
> $Revisions:
> RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com
> RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM-01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM
> $MsgTrackFlags: 0
> DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:51 AM
>
>
>>Greetings!
>>
>> I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running)
>>A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to
>>sa-learn and learned it as ham.
>>
>>I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up.
>>What is the best way of accomplishing this?
>>
>>Jason
>
> You probably did something like 'cat message | sa-learn --ham' to learn
it
> as ham. Like that you can do 'cat message | sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED]' to
> send it again. Or you can do 'cat message | spamassassin -D' to just
> evaluate what spamassassin would have done with the message.
>
> Menno van Bennekom
>
>
>
> Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by
> psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP
id
> 2005012009351447:24295 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:14 -0600
> Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1
> (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235314196; Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 09:35:14 -0600
> Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id
> 121DD11460; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:14 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199])
by
> smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D7E7011440 for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:12 -0600 (CST)
> Received: (qmail 59655 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:45 -0000
> Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Received: (qmail 59591 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:44 -0000
> Delivered_To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 59459 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:43 -0000
> X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=1.8 required=10.0
> tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,DNS_FROM_RFC_POST
> X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org
> Received_SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
> Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (HELO rwcrmhc13.comcast.net)
> (204.127.198.39) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan
2005
> 07:34:43 -0800
> Received: from mk.comcast.net
> (pcp0010744015pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net[69.243.87.84]) by
> comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id
<2005012015343501500d5spde>;
> Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:34:41 +0000
> $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> $Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14
> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:38 AM
> SendTo: "Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank]"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Spamassassin 3.0.2 child processes
> In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> t>
> References:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> X_Virus_Checked: Checked
> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pfbspmp1.transplace.com
> X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham
> version=2.63
> X_Spam_Level:
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July
> 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle
> Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:22
> AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM
> SMTPOriginator:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $UpdatedBy:
> $Orig:
> Categories:
> $Revisions:
> RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com
> RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM-01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM
> $MsgTrackFlags: 0
> DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:35:14 AM
>
> At 06:58 AM 1/20/2005, Thomas Kinghorn [MTNNS -Rosebank] wrote:
>
>>Is there a way to limit spamd child processes?
>>
>># ps -ef | grep spam
>>
>>root 602 1 0 13:28 ? 00:00:12 /usr/bin/spamd -d -c -m5
>
> -H
>
>>xadmin 649 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:09 spamd child
>>xadmin 650 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:07 spamd child
>>xadmin 651 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:13 spamd child
>>root 652 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:10 spamd child
>>root 653 602 0 13:29 ? 00:00:08 spamd child
>
>
>
> Yes, with the -m parameter you are already using. You've got -m5, spamd
> has 5 children.. set it to -m2 and you'll get 2.
>
>
>
>
> Received: from p2kwshp1 ([10.67.3.129]) by
> psplotp1.transplace.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with SMTP
id
> 2005012009354443:24330 ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:44 -0600
> Received: From smtp.transplace.com ([10.67.100.156]) by p2kwshp1
> (WebShield SMTP v4.5 MR1a P0803.345); id 1106235344541; Thu, 20 Jan
> 2005 09:35:44 -0600
> Received: by smtp.transplace.com (Postfix, from userid 1035) id
> 63A2811457; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:44 -0600 (CST)
> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [209.237.227.199])
by
> smtp.transplace.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B5DDF1148D for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:35:34 -0600 (CST)
> Received: (qmail 60113 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:49 -0000
> Mailing_List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
> Precedence: bulk
> list_help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> list_post: <mailto:users@spamassassin.apache.org>
> List_Id: <users.spamassassin.apache.org>
> Delivered_To: mailing list users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Received: (qmail 59968 invoked by uid 500); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:47 -0000
> Delivered_To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Received: (qmail 59936 invoked by uid 99); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:47 -0000
> X_ASF_Spam_Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=
> X_Spam_Check_By: apache.org
> Received_SPF: neutral (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
> Received: from mailgate1.dslextreme.com (HELO mailgate1.dslextreme.com)
> (66.51.199.94) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005
> 07:34:45 -0800
> Received: from mail5.dslextreme.com (unknown [192.168.7.93]) by
> mailgate1.dslextreme.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 80D59630309 for
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 07:32:11
-0800
> (PST)
> Received: (qmail 1604 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2005 15:34:42 -0000
> Received: from unknown (HELO espphotography.dslextreme.com)
> (66.245.217.196) by mail5.dslextreme.com with SMTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2005
> 07:34:42 -0800
> $MessageID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> $Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14
> PostedDate: 01/20/2005 09:34:36 AM
> SendTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Testing a message
> In_Reply_To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MIME_Version: 1.0
> X_DSLExtreme_MailGate_Information: Please contact the ISP for more
> information
> X_DSLExtreme_MailGate: Found to be clean
> X_MailScanner_From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X_Virus_Checked: Checked
> X_Spam_Checker_Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> pfbspmp1.transplace.com
> X_Spam_Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00
autolearn=ham
> version=2.63
> X_Spam_Level:
> $MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on psplotp1/com(Release 5.0.11 |July
> 24, 2002) at 01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM,MIME-CD by Notes Client on Kyle
> Reynolds/com(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/20/2005 09:44:22
> AM,MIME-CD complete at 01/20/2005 09:44:22 AM
> SMTPOriginator:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $UpdatedBy:
> $Orig:
> Categories:
> $Revisions:
> RouteServers: CN=psplotp1/O=com
> RouteTimes: 01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM-01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM
> $MsgTrackFlags: 0
> DeliveredDate: 01/20/2005 09:35:44 AM
>
> At 07:22 AM 1/20/2005, you wrote:
>
>
>>Greetings!
>>
>> I'm using SA 3.0.2 with postfix and amavisd. (so no spamd is running)
>>A message came in that was not spam that got blocked. I took it to
>>sa-learn and learned it as ham.
>>
>>I want to take the message now and re-score it to see how it holds up.
>>What is the best way of accomplishing this?
>
>
> Someone will I'm sure correct me if I'm wrong...
>
> but back when I was a geek in training, I could save the message to a
file,
> and run
>
> spamassassin < filename1 > filename2
>
> where filename1 was the original file, filename2 is the output file that
SA
> would create with the new score.
>
> This may have changed...
>
> Evan
>
>
**********************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> Kyle Reynolds
> 972-731-4731
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
