Daniel Quinlan wrote:
Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do.
Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly mass-check results for SURBL:
Perhaps he means spews lists lists.surbl.org. I can't see anyone having issues with any of the SURBL RBL's.
Regards,
Rick
