Rick Macdougall wrote: > Daniel Quinlan wrote: >> Raymond Dijkxhoorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> >>> Ohw well, lists.surbl.org also. At some point they hopefully >>> understand that list will completely useless, and indeed insain for >>> people to actually use it. Sadly, people still do. >> >> >> Whatever your unstated reasons are, I beg to differ. Weekly >> mass-check results for SURBL: > > Perhaps he means spews lists lists.surbl.org. I can't see anyone > having issues with any of the SURBL RBL's. > I must not have things set up correctly then. I get many MANY false positives from the SURBL lists, in the case where the server that actually sent me the message records the IP from which they received it.
For example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] sends me email. It goes from his PC to the MTA of fubar.isp, and from there to my server. Fubar.isp records the PC's IP address in the headers, and passes the message; on my server, Spamassassin sees that the original IP is listed, and tags it. Never mind that it came to me via a reputable server, the original IP is "bad". How, then, do I fix this so that the lists are more useful: so that they check the most recent hop, and not (necessarily) all hops in the chain? -Don
