Am Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 22:46 schrieb Jim Maul:
> Mike Jackson wrote:
> >> http://lowendmac.com/lite/05/0210.html
> >
> > I sent it to myself...
> >
> > X-Spam-Report:
> > *  1.8 URG_BIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
> > *  0.7 SARE_MONEYTERMS BODY: Talks about money in some way.
> > *  0.7 SARE_URGBIZ BODY: Contains urgent matter
> > *  2.6 NA_DOLLARS BODY: Talks about a million North American dollars
> > *  0.4 US_DOLLARS_3 BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN)
> > * -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
> > *      [score: 0.0003]
> > *  1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
> > *      [URIs: walla.com]
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_10 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_1 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  3.4 NIGERIAN_BODY1 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 1+
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X5 Matches 5+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X6 Matches 6+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.2 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
> > *  0.6 NIGERIAN_BODY2 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 2+
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X3 Matches 3+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_X4 Matches 4+ phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_6 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_3 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_5 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  0.1 NIGERIAN_BODY3 Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 3+
> > *  1.7 SARE_FRAUD_2 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  0.9 SARE_FRAUD_9 Matches 2 phrases commonly used in fraud spam
> > *  -15 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
> >
> > The AWL hit is because I sent it from my work address. The low Bayes
> > score surprises me; my Bayes database should be loaded with crap like
> > that.
>
> I just tried saving the text to a file and running spamc on it.  It
> didnt have any headers or anything but it still managed a score of 10.6
> on my system without any add on rules...pretty good i think.  My bayes
> hit with a BAYES_44.
>
> -Jim

Without the SARE rules I got the following low scores. One rule is my own 
TA_Save_b01.

Thomas

Content analysis details:   (6.0 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-3.3 ALL_TRUSTED            Did not pass through any untrusted hosts
 1.8 URG_BIZ                BODY: Contains urgent matter
 0.5 TA_Save_b01            BODY: Promise to save
 2.6 NA_DOLLARS             BODY: Talks about a million North American dollars
 0.4 US_DOLLARS_3           BODY: Mentions millions of $ ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN)
 0.0 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 40 to 60%
                            [score: 0.5000]
 0.6 NIGERIAN_BODY2         Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 2+
 3.4 NIGERIAN_BODY1         Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 1+
 0.1 NIGERIAN_BODY3         Message body looks like a Nigerian spam message 3+


-- 
icq:133073900
http://www.t-arend.de

Attachment: pgpkPXoWqbaaF.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to