> >Scores pretty well (14.3, 9.0 required), though, I heard that >SpamAssassin >3+ included the SARE_FRAUD rules (or similiar). But looking at >the report, I >don't see any fraud-hits from SpamAssassin :-/ > >Would it be wise to re-add SARE_FRAUD as a extra ruleset to >SpamAssassin? > >Kind Regards, >Sander Holthaus
The beauty of it, is you can add them and score them to your taste, just for a test. But I see no harm in adding them in anyway. But I might be biased ;) --Chris
