On 19 Oct 2017, at 21:15 (-0400), Alex wrote:
Why wouldn't you just run the sample I provided through spamassassin again?
1. I have no way of knowing what your LOCAL configuration is but I'm certain that it is substantially unlike any I would put into production use. It includes rules not in the standard set, short-circuits at least one rule, and appears to have both Bayes and AWL/TxRep disabled.
2. I don't know if it is justifiable, but the munging of that message makes it problematic to run as-is.
I wish you success with working out a solution for detecting this spam. -- Bill Cole b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) Currently Seeking Paying Work: https://linkedin.com/in/billcole
