Hi, On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:35 PM, Bill Cole <[email protected]> wrote: > On 19 Oct 2017, at 21:15 (-0400), Alex wrote: > >> Why wouldn't you just run the sample I provided through spamassassin >> again? > > > 1. I have no way of knowing what your LOCAL configuration is but I'm certain > that it is substantially unlike any I would put into production use. It > includes rules not in the standard set, short-circuits at least one rule, > and appears to have both Bayes and AWL/TxRep disabled. > > 2. I don't know if it is justifiable, but the munging of that message makes > it problematic to run as-is. > > I wish you success with working out a solution for detecting this spam.
I wanted to add that sometimes things aren't completely clear in email, and didn't want to sound ungrateful, so yes, thank you for your help.
