On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 22:35:08 -0000, David Gessel
<ges...@blackrosetech.com> wrote:
1) sa-learn seems really, really slow. Slow enough that spam
sometimes comes in faster. This seems far slower than the
benchmark results suggest is within the range of normal. I'm sure
I'm doing something really wrong, but not sure what.
On 31.10.17 08:44, Kevin Golding wrote:
sa-learn is more suited to individual or small batches of messages.
You'll get significantly improved performance using spamc -L spam (or
ham, or forget).
1. spamc requires to be fed with individual messages.
2. spamc communicates with spamd
The OP has amavisd running and therefore apparently does not use spamd.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".
