On 2 Jan 2018, at 07:17, David Jones djo...@ena.com> wrote: > I haven't redefined these rules from what I can tell by searching my local > rules. I would think that if I had done this, then there would be consistent > non-hits of BAYES_99 with BAYES_999 all of the time. This is only happening > a small percentage of the time.
Checking my mail I see an incidence rate of this of about 0.5%, which matches the rate you posted earlier. -- Hey, how come Andrew gets to get up? If he gets up, we'll all get up! It'll be anarchy!
