On Thu, 18 Jan 2018 18:49:52 -0500 Chip wrote: > Very well stated. Bravo! > > The end point here is to examine the email headers that specifically > refer to dkim and spf signatures. Based on fail or pass, or some > combination in concert with the sender's email address, they get moved > into fail or pass folders. ... > But that is with spamassassin still identifying spam, which is > unnecessary in this case as this project will never attract spam - I > know that is hard to believe in, but it won't.
Then why do you care about spf and dkim?
