On 15.04.18 11:55, Computer Bob wrote:
Here is a root scan: https://pastebin.com/qdXMRzKb
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=10.2 required=4.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_PASS,
URIBL_DBL_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
Here is the same run under spamd: https://pastebin.com/SvvYptYv
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE,
RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_PASS
autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1
the main two differences are AWL and BAYES_00 which means
1. your spamd' bayes database is mistrained
2. you apparently should disable AWL at least until you train bayes
properly.
On 4/15/18 11:34 AM, Computer Bob wrote:
Greeting all, *
*I have had some issues with spam getting low scores and in
troubleshooting I have found that if I run a command line check
with "spamassassin -D -x < test" on a mail in question, I get a
very high score when run under user root. When run under user spamd
it gets a low passing score. This is on obvious spam mail. Any
advice on how to determine what is the difference ? *
*
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
