On Nov 8, 2018, at 2:19 PM, Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> wrote: > > [Resending because it looks like my first send went into a black hole...]
All SA messages appear to be coming with significantly delays today... not sure why. I got RW's first message, sent at 8am today, only about an hour ago, AFTER the message when they said they'd already answered the question. >> Do I need to completely trash and rebuild my DB, or am I missing something >> obvious? > > No and no. > > Although it is perhaps helpful to recognize that Bayes is inherently > imperfect and will always be wrong about some messages. I definitely recognize that Bayes is imperfect. My worry is that very few of my spams in recent days/weeks seem to be getting BAYES_99*, while some of them are getting BAYES_00/05. I used to get lots of BAYES_99s, but not so much now, despite training. Hence my concern that something is borked. > Assuming that you did that breakage yourself, intentionally: Stop doing that. > It is pointless and hampers any attempt to assist you. The only things that > could ever be private about spam are the target address and internally-added > headers. I did do it intentionally, and thanks for the warning -- I will stop doing that in the future and sanitize only the target address and internal headers. Thanks! --- Amir
