On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail and the
> above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions.
On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote:
How can I do it without the fractions?
On 20.11.18 21:05, RW wrote:
meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH 4*__MAILBOX + 4*__LOCAL_EXCEEDED +
4*__LOCAL_STORAGE + 4*__LOCAL_LIMIT > 10
or
meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH __MAILBOX + __LOCAL_EXCEEDED + __LOCAL_STORAGE
+ __LOCAL_LIMIT >= 3
note that the latter does not mean the same when either of those rules has
"tflags multiple" set (unless with maxhits=1)
Actually, that comment applies to *any* mathematical meta threshold logic
involving "tflags multiple" rules.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The problem is when people look at Yahoo, slashdot, or groklaw and
jump from obvious and correct observations like "Oh my God, this
place is teeming with utter morons" to incorrect conclusions like
"there's nothing of value here". -- Al Petrofsky, in Y! SCOX
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
603 days since the first commercial re-flight of an orbital booster (SpaceX)
