On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 08:24:07 -0800 (PST) John Hardin wrote: > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018, RW wrote: > > > On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 09:49:34 +0100 > > Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > >>>>> But as I said it's the decimal fractions that cause it to fail > >>>>> and the above rule doesn't need to contain decimal fractions. > >> > >>> On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 13:36:52 -0500 micah anderson wrote: > >>>> How can I do it without the fractions? > >> > >> On 20.11.18 21:05, RW wrote: > >>> meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH 4*__MAILBOX + 4*__LOCAL_EXCEEDED + > >>> 4*__LOCAL_STORAGE + 4*__LOCAL_LIMIT > 10 > >>> > >>> or > >>> > >>> meta LOCAL_EXCEEDED_PHISH __MAILBOX + __LOCAL_EXCEEDED + > >>> __LOCAL_STORAGE + __LOCAL_LIMIT >= 3 > >> > >> note that the latter does not mean the same when either of those > >> rules has "tflags multiple" set (unless with maxhits=1) > > > > If you set the same tflags for both versions they produce the same > > results. > > "tflags multiple" does not apply to metas,
I took it as read that he meant the flags of the sub-rules.
