On 2019-05-10 12:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
I wanted to comment OP's mail, but since I don't have DKIM set up, I
wasn't
sure it would pass :-)
I actually didn't have DKIM signing set up myself until a couple weeks
ago. I had been lazy in setting it for a while, but I had to because
the first time I would email anyone on gmail it was going directly to
their spam folder. Hotmail too, to a lesser extent. But Google is
really aggressive with unsigned mail, and they have a strong "it's our
way or the highway" policy.
On 10.05.19 14:48, David Jones wrote:
I caution against this since non-DKIM signed email has no relation to
spam or ham. How did you come up with the "about 90%" number? Did
you
grep logs to get real numbers over a couple of months?
I should clarify. I do get DKIM-signed spam. I just don't get any
non-DKIM-signed ham. Going back and looking at my archived mail and
logs I can see that a) all legitimate emails were DKIM-signed, and b)
virtually every message that was not DKIM-signed was spam. So I intend
to assign no ham scoring weight to a message having a DKIM signature,
but I do feel pretty safe in assigning a heavy penalty to those mails
without it.
Sorry Matus. :)
Kurt
