I recently migrated SA to a new environment with a clean install.  I added the KAM rules and a short rules file of my own. But I'm obviously missing some pretty basic rules that I believe I had in the old environment.   Just as an example (one of hundreds...), today I received an email about Asian women that had little doubt about it's spam characteristics.  Yet I got the rating below from SA.   The content had more than enough keywords that I would think 'some' rules would have been hit.  Yet the only thing SA tells me is it suspects the TLD and it has too many break characters.  Something is wrong.  Just off the top of your head, can you tell me a few rules that likely should have flagged this message?  If I know a couple of rules to look for, I can try to see why none of them are flagging this email.  Any advice will be greatly appreciated.  (BTW, if it matters, I'm running on AWS EC2, Linux2 instance).  Thx

X-SpamAssassin_109: Content preview:  Just to Say Hello 
http://www.eyestrongpro.icu/l/lt172P21166EE1247K/1884YQ6160P10097IT163UE64992145HF620698297
X-SpamAssassin_110:    Unsubscribe Here [...]
X-SpamAssassin_111:
X-SpamAssassin_112: Content analysis details:   (3.8 points, 4.0 required)
X-SpamAssassin_113:
X-SpamAssassin_114:  pts rule name              description
X-SpamAssassin_115: ---- ---------------------- 
--------------------------------------------------
X-SpamAssassin_116:  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP            Message was received from an IP 
address
X-SpamAssassin_117:  0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP4           Message was received from an 
IPv4 address
X-SpamAssassin_118:  0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE          SPF: HELO does not publish an 
SPF Record
X-SpamAssassin_119:  0.0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_04    BODY: HTML has a low ratio of 
text to image area
X-SpamAssassin_120:  0.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
X-SpamAssassin_121:  1.8 CBJ_GiveMeABreak       Messages with consecutive break 
characters
X-SpamAssassin_122:  2.0 KAM_ICU_BAD_TLD        .icu TLD Abuse
X-SpamAssassin_123:

Reply via email to