> On Jul 11, 2020, at 6:33 AM, Riccardo Alfieri <riccardo.alfi...@spamteq.com>
> wrote:
>
> On 10/07/20 22:51, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
>>
>> That’s unrealistic. Many ISPs these days that aren’t the “big boys” with
>> dedicated staff for every facet of ISP operations, they are one and two man
>> shops running WISPs in rural areas or developing countries. It’s not the
>> 90’s anymore. It’s a terrible default, even home users should have to take
>> an effort to enable a commercial service.
> I'm not going to make comments about running an ISP without a basic knowledge
> of email/hosting/networking
Wow, nice sales pitch my man! I will definitely recommend they sign up.
>> And spamhaus should just replace the sales pitch email with instructions on
>> how to comment their stuff out if they don’t want small ISPs (a small
>> business, actually!) to use it. :)
>
> Excuse me but isn't it at least "fair" that, if you use a service provided by
> others for commercial purposes, you pay for that service that contributes to
> your income?
Then it shouldn’t be free for “small businesses”. Having spam-free mailboxes
will enhance their ability to conduct business, no? Or does your product not
provide value.
> And I don't know where you got a quote of "hundreds of dollars per month" for
> 1000 mailboxes, but it's not really the case if you use DQS.
No idea what DQS is, nor do I care. The quote was from a sales rep. But the
Spamhaus pitch was laughably expensive for less than 1,000 mailboxes - much
more than they make on those mailboxes.
C
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Riccardo Alfieri
>
> Spamhaus Technology
> https://www.spamhaustech.com/
>
