The question you ask is exactly why we have the DNSBL Inclusion policy and require the free for some model.
We might need to kick up the need for the BLOCKED rule with instructions in that description on how to disable the rules. What are your thoughts on that? -- Kevin A. McGrail Member, Apache Software Foundation Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:55 AM M. Omer GOLGELI <o...@chronos.com.tr> wrote: > July 11, 2020 1:33 PM, "Riccardo Alfieri" <riccardo.alfi...@spamteq.com> > wrote: > > > Excuse me but isn't it at least "fair" that, if you use a service > provided by others for commercial > > purposes, you pay for that service that contributes to your income? > > It is fair. > > Unless you have been unknowingly using it and weren't aware of the limits. > > But maybe this kind of RBLs shouldn't be on by default due to their > commercial nature and must be left to the user to activate after > installation. > > > > > > M. Omer GOLGELI >
