On 7/14/20 9:41 AM, jdow wrote:
On 20200714 00:31:19, @lbutlr wrote:
On 14 Jul 2020, at 01:22, jdow <j...@earthlink.net> wrote:
How does this move improve the technical quality of the product
from the end users' perspective?
You've been told repeatedly that the decision has been made, and
you have ignored everyone and attacked anyone who has posted on
this any opinion that deviated from you WRONG opinion. No one
cares.
Stop it.
Am I being bullied because you cannot answer a simple question?
I've been keeping my mouth shut until somebody aims a shot at me. At
least have the grace to admit your changes have zero technical
merit, may cause pain at the sysadmin and user level, and will happen
anyway because of some nebulous social goodness from it. (Hint,
betcha a nickle, my maximum bet, that it does not draw in more
minorities to the development effort. OTHER problems need to be
addressed at a social level.)
The sad thing about this is that while the changes may feed some egos
and make suits happy, the load is put on people who won't be able to
charge for the extra work. No client will be willing to cover these
costs. Tech workforce will be pulled off real work to massage some egos.
In my case it will be a few hundred hours which will not be accounted
for. Thanks for that.
