sha...@shanew.net writes: > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020, Axb wrote: > >> On 7/10/20 8:31 PM, Bill Cole wrote: >>> The SpamAssassin Project has a particular self-interest in attracting >>> contributors from a diversity of cultures, because we are always at risk >>> of mislabelling a pattern of letters or words as 'spammy' when in fact it >>> is entirely normal in a cultural context other than those of the existing >>> contributors to the project. C >> >> From what I see, until now, only two ppl of the SpamAssasin project >> have supported this motion and intend to impose this quatsch to the >> rest of the world. >> Voices against these changes have been politely ignored. > > The danger of judging the world only by what is within your sight is > that your field of vision is limited, and there are any number of > explanations for why what you see is not representative of the > whole.
Maybe giving in to a very small but very loud and aggressive minority is even worse. > Maybe those who agree feel no need to comment. Maybe a lot of people > on either side of the issue want to avoid adding more noise to a list > that's about SpamAssassin. Maybe a lot of people recognized this > wasn't a "motion" or a request for comment at all, but rather notice > of a change to code. Or, as you yourself mention, maybe a lot of > people are just politely ignoring the negative voices. You are doing here what you accuse the people you do not agree with. Are you a democrat. ;-) -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
